Overfishing
I became interested in overfishing after I read two articles about the serious impact of this issue. Overfishing is a real threat to the fish population. First, I chose an article talking about salmon as an example of this problem. There will be a misbalance in the sea’s environment. According to Jeff Barnard, “wild pacific salmon will become practically extinct this century without big changes in how the harvest is managed” (2006, par. 2). The second article was about overfishing in general and about people who make decisions in regard to the fish industry. Some of those people were “dominated by fishing interests” (Anchorage Daily News, 2005, par. 2). Alaska in the author’s opinion was a very good example of good fish management. He recommended implementing Alaska’s standards. Many countries are considered dangerous to the sea’s environments, for example Spain and Portugal; they are the greatest threat to the fish stocks in the world (Brown, 2005). According to Brown, “The high level of subsidies are part of the reason that nearly 75 percent of the fish stock are at risk. The need for action is clear” (2005, par. 9). Finally, there are no sufficient laws to regulate and control the commercial limits of fishing.
I plan on writing that three actions should be considered and enforced as soon as possible, to save the rest of fish population and the environment of the world. First, a global action has to be made regarding promoting new laws to protect the fish population. Second, organizations have to be established to stand against any harmful decisions and to make new studies about the danger of overfishing in the long term. Finally, we should raise the awareness of ordinary people and make them feel the problem, participate and make pressure to change bad policies.
First, how can we unite as a world of nations against such a problem? At the beginning, we have to show the world how serious this issue is; we have to publish the studies regarding the impact on the environment of overfishing. After that the leading organizations, for example, the United Nations, have to take actions and try to create cooperation between countries to stand against such a mutual enemy, overfishing. This is simply because it is one world and a common problem, that we have to work together to solve it. According to a report that was released from the United Nations, “… destructive fishing techniques are threatening the world’s fisheries and as a result, almost three quarters of the world’s fish stocks have been overexploited or depleted” (States News Service, 2006, par. 5). As an example of these organizations we have a regional council named The Gulf of Mexico Fishery management Council; it is one eight other regional councils, which is not the ambition we look for, because their performance is poor (U.S. Newswire, 2005), but it means we are on the right track. According to Dorsett, regarding the council’s task, “setting appropriate management measures to build these populations to healthy levels must be implemented if we are to achieve sustainable fisheries …” (U.S. Newswire, 2005, par. 2). An effective role of an organization like UN will be much better, but unfortunately this goal is not yet achieved as Secretary General Kofi Annan said in UN report; that certain fish stocks have “declined to the point where their commercial value has become insignificant” while other stocks “have been so substantially reduced that their biological survival is seriously threatened” (States News Service, 2006, Par.4). In that meeting, the participants stress the necessity of a real implementation of the treaty (States News Service, 2006).
The second thing that could work closely with the first, is establishing new organizations or committees, from the interested environmentalists, to gather their efforts, and to work as a team, to show the decision maker the real threat. They can also work together with the same organizations abroad and learn from each other’s experience. They should have the capacity to conduct new studies and research. In order to do that successfully, we have to rely on scientific methods to the limits that should not be exceeded. According to Powell, “… prevent overcapitalization of fishing fleets and set and enforce responsible limits based on science, they can make progress in ending overfishing and rebuilding stocks” (U.S. Newswire, 2005, par. 6).
The role of ordinary people is an effective role to make changes. But, people have to have the knowledge and the necessary awareness of this problem, in order to understand what they have to do. That could be achieved through education in schools, universities, and special institutes. We should have a new generation that has to be concerned about its environment, because of their life, and the future generation’s life. If they acquire the minimum knowledge of this great threat, they would participate in any method they can. If we assume that we have enough organizations that taking care of this issue, people don't know about these organizations. Therefore, international entities have to arrange these organizations and show the public what they are doing (Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2005). The need is more where overfishing is worse, like Canada and Europe. The government has to play the main role in addressing this issue, relying on science, “Many participants stressed the leading role that science should play in the management of fish stocks, particularly in Europe and in urban centers in Canada, …” (Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2005, par. 6). Organizations have to conduct lectures and seminars in order to demonstrate the serious threat, and make that an important part of the education system.
In order to make students aware of what happens in their environments, if they understand especially in universities, they can convey that to their families, society and the circle keeps growing, till we have an appropriate culture regarding environment. Then people can make pressure on their governments to make big changes in the current policies. According to Teran, “The misconceptions that have driven the world to deplete many coastal fisheries, with predictable economic, social, political and environmental consequences, have created a global concern about mankind’s future actions to stop it in time” (1998, par. 4). An example of what people can do is to pressure a government to stop the subsidies that are considered part of the problem (Brown, 2005).
Finally, I believe the way to solve this problem will not be achieved until we have combination between the aforementioned solutions. Efforts from leading organizations are the starting point to monitor countries and enforce sanctions on those not committed. According to Grainger, “Managing the world’s fish stocks is a major challenge both at present and in the future”; he said also regarding fisheries, “If successful, the project will help us to keep track of fisheries across the world by taking information from a wide variety of sources and providing us with rapid real-time information” (States News Service, 2006, par. 10). Private organizations have to be established either from government support or the concerned environmentalists with help from the same once within a country or abroad. Ordinary people can do a great job, but after we educate them and show them the real threat on their environments and on themselves. After they have the required knowledge, they can be used as a good tool to achieve the ultimate goal: “sustainable environments”.
Bibliography:
Anchorage Daily News (Alaska). (2005, Nov. 18). Congress should embrace our approach to prevent overfishing. Retrieved on March 31, 2006 from LexisNexis database.
Barnard, J. (2006, Jan. 26). Administration pitches new policy. Associated Press Online. Retrieved on March 27, 2006 from
http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/projects/salmon2100htm
Brown, O. (2005, Dec. 14). Overfishing puts free-trade advocates and environmentalists in same boat. Associated Press Worldstream. Retrieved on April 17, 2006 from LexisNexis database.
Gissurarson, H. H. (2000). Overfishing: The Icelandic solution. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (Canada). (2005, May 4). Media room. Focus groups provide insight into the views of Canadians and Europeans on the global overfishing problem. Retrieved on April 27, 2006 from
http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/media/newsrel/2005/nq-ac29_e.htm
States News Service. (2006, March 20). At meeting countries call for strengthening treaty to curb overfishing. Retrieved on April 18, 2006 from LexisNexis database.
Teran, F. H. (1998, March 19). Overfishing in the global village. IWMC World Conservation Trust. Retrieved on April 27, 2006 from http://www.iwmc.org./sustain/Articles/980319.htm
U. S. Newswire. (2005, Nov. 14). Fishery council to finalize management plan for 2006 recreational red grouper fishery; continues to threaten fish population, future of fishing in the gulf. Retrieved on April 17, 2006 from LexisNexis database.



